課程資訊
課程名稱
永續發展與法律專題
Sustainable Development and Law 
開課學期
112-2 
授課對象
社會科學院  公共事務研究所  
授課教師
李仲軒 
課號
GIPA5019 
課程識別碼
343 U0280 
班次
 
學分
2.0 
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期三A,B(18:25~20:10) 
上課地點
社科研605 
備註
限學士班三年級以上
總人數上限:35人
外系人數限制:30人 
 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

永續發展之概念,一般認為始自1987年的「布倫特蘭報告」(Brundtland Report),迄今三十餘年。可以說,永續發展作為理念,已經成為普世的價值、全球性的共通語言。消極來說,幾乎沒有國家或公私組織,公開表達對於永續發展理念的反對。而積極來看,永續發展的理念已經廣泛滲透到各種政策、社會領域,而且不只是一種模糊的理念或遙遠的政策目標,而是有正式定義,為各國施政方針、政策計畫與法制建構之基本原則。
然永續發展理念的蓬勃興盛,相對於其低度落實的程度,顯不相稱。即便逐漸透過制度化、法律化來予強化,然而面對根植於資源有限性與科技未知性的基本難題,對於如何實現永續三支柱的平衡,兼顧「代內正義」與「代際正義」,仍需持續多方反思、反覆論辯。本課程嘗試耙梳永續發展與民主法治之間的關聯與互動,期能透過比較法之途徑,更深入思考,面對這些難題,法律系統應如何與永續發展相整合,以提供有效的制度性支持,同時深化自身之底蘊。
本課程嘗試以永續發展為主軸,說明法律系統內外的相互影響,並對全球、區域、國內法律治理及永續發展法的建構,提出建議。一方面,將看似純粹法律概念與適用的爭論,置於更大的經濟、社會及環境脈絡中,將有助系統內部問題的釐清。相對的,即使不具備完全之拘束力及執行力,完整的永續發展法律架構,所具備的整合性與反思性,對於促進社群結構內,各種社會次級系統間的連結與溝通,乃至全球規模的整合與治理,亦屬至關重要。 

課程目標
1. 瞭解永續發展的理論,對於具體法律制度形成、法解釋與適用之影響。
2. 瞭解法律論證結構,對於探索永續發展之意義與型態之作用。
3. 瞭解永續發展相關制度實踐,包含永續報告、評估等,與其他法律制度規範之互動。
4. 瞭解永續發展與法律相互關連、構成的實務個案。
5. 撰寫永續發展為主題的法律研究報告。 
課程要求
本課程性質上屬於專題討論(seminar)。課程重視課堂參與、討論,但不鼓勵未經準備、不具說理、人云亦云的「意見」。同學對於指定教材的事先閱讀,課堂上的發言與參與,課後研究複習、整理心得筆記,都是這門課最基本的上課態度與條件。
為增強學習效果,每位同學都將負責至少一次的課堂口頭報告,負責導讀文本,並帶領討論。負責報告同學必須提前一日繳交當週閱讀所整理的書面心得報告。同學可自行選擇不同周次的主題進行導讀。
但每位修課同學每週上課前都應完整閱讀指定資料,於課前以書面提出問題清單,參與課程討論,並整理課後心得筆記,上述表現及資料都將納入課堂討論與參與之評分。
期末需繳交學期書面報告,並應符合基本學術論文要求。為協助同學撰寫,本課程規劃期末口頭報告,由同學針對學期書面報告,提出研究計畫並說明,藉由與授課教師的指導與同學間的相互提問、自由討論、腦力激盪,解決共通寫作問題的機會與訓練,使研究計畫逐漸成形,最終得以完成具基本學術水平之學期書面報告。 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
 
指定閱讀
暫訂,可能視情況調整
一、 指定閱讀(請詳述每週指定閱讀) Required readings

Week 1 課程說明與導論
Volker Mauerhofer (ed.), The Role of Law in Governing Sustainability (Routledge 2021).

Week 2 何謂永續發展?代內正義與代際正義
Klinsky S and Winkler H, ‘Equity, sustainable development and climate policy’ (2014) 14 Climate Policy 1.

Week 3 永續發展三支柱與永續發展之發展歷程
Hugh Wilkins, ‘The Integration of the Pillars of Sustainable Development: A Work in Progress’ (2008) McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy / Revue Internationale de Droit et Politique Du Developpement Durable de McGill vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 163–88.

Week 4 強永續VS弱永續
Neumayer E, Weak versus strong sustainability: exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms (4th edition. edn, Edward Elgar 2013)

Week 5 誰的永續發展?地方、內國、國際、區域到全球
Sam Headon, ‘Whose Sustainable Development-Sustainable Development under the Kyoto Protocol, the Coldplay Effect, and the CDM Gold Standard’ (2008) Colo. J. Int'l Envtl. L. & Pol'y 20: 127.

Week 6 永續發展的批判理論;殖民主義與新自由主義(Neoliberalism)
Harvey D, A brief history of neoliberalism (Oxford University Press 2005)

Week 7 循環經濟與全球化
Brais Suarez-Eiroa et al, ‘Operational principles of circular economy for sustainable development: Linking theory and practice’ (2019) Journal of cleaner production 214: 952-961.

Week 8 永續發展與法律;法律之不同形式:原則與規則
Virginie Barral, ‘Sustainable Development's Function as an International Legal Norm: From Interpretation to Obligation of Means’ (2019) Comparative Law Review, LIII(1), pp. 25-46.

Week 9 永續發展作為原則
Andre Nollkaemper, ‘Three conceptions of the integration principle in international environmental law’ (2012) in ByAndrea Lenschow (eds), Environmental Policy Integration. (Routledge 2001) 34-44.

Week 10 永續發展作為規則
Gillroy JM, 'Adjudication Norms, Dispute Settlement Regimes and International Tribunals: The Status of Environmental Sustainability in International Jurisprudence' (2006) 42 Stan J Int'l L 1.

Week 11 「永續發展目標」(SDGs)與「臺灣永續發展目標」;SDGs與CSR、ESG,什麼關係?
Persson A, Weitz N and Nilsson M, 'Follow-up and Review of the Sustainable Development Goals: Alignment vs. Internalization' (2016) 25 Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law 59.

Week 12 永續發展指標與永續報告(Corporate Sustainability Reports)
Rennings K and Wiggering H, 'Steps towards indicators of sustainable development: Linking economic and ecological concepts' (1997) 20 Ecological Economics 25.

Week 13 永續影響評估:永續,誰說了算?
Alan Bond, Angus Morrison-Saunders, and Jenny Pope, ‘Sustainability assessment: the state of the art’ (2012) 30 (1) Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 53-62.

Week 14 期末報告與討論:尋找問題
Week 15 期末報告與討論:研究設計
Week 16 學生團體報告/辯論:Internal colloquium

二、 延伸閱讀(請詳述每週延伸閱讀) Extension readings

Week 1 課程說明與導論
Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger and Ashfaq Khalfan, Sustainable development law: principles, practices, and prospects (Oxford 2004).
European Commission(Michael Decleris), The law of sustainable development: General principles (Office for Official Publications of the European Community 2000), Retrieved December 27 2022 from https://bookshop.europa.eu/en/the-law-of-sustainable-developmentpbKH2800834/

Week 2 何謂永續發展?代內正義與代際正義
G. F. Maggio, ‘Inter/Intra-Generational Equity: Current Applications under International Law for Promoting the Sustainable Development of Natural Resources’ (1997) 4 Buff. Envtl. L.J. 161.
Manderscheid K, 'Planning Sustainability: Intergenerational and Intragenerational Justice in Spatial Planning Strategies' (2012) 44 Antipode 197.

Week 3 永續發展三支柱與永續發展之發展歷程
B. Purvis, Y. Mao, & D. Robinson, ‘Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins’ (2019) Sustain Sci 14, 681–695.
Robert B. Gibson, ‘Beyond the pillars: sustainability assessment as a framework for effective integration of social, economic and ecological considerations in significant decision-making’ (2006) 8 (03) Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 259-280.

Week 4 強永續VS弱永續
Bosselmann K, 'Strong and weak sustainable development: making differences in the design of law' (2006) 13 South African Journal of Environmental Law & Policy 39.
Frederic Ang and Steven Van Passel, 'Beyond the Environmentalist’s Paradox and the Debate on Weak versus Strong Sustainability' (2012) 62 BioScience 251.

Week 5 誰的永續發展?地方、內國、國際、區域到全球
P. Cullet, Differential treatment in international environmental law (Ashgate 2003).

Week 6 永續發展的批判理論;殖民主義與新自由主義(Neoliberalism)
Steger MB, Neoliberalism a very short introduction (Oxford University Press 2010).
Saad-Filho A and Johnston D, Neoliberalism: A critical reader (University of Chicago Press 2005).

Week 7 循環經濟與全球化
P. Newell, Climate capitalism: global warming and the transformation of the global economy (Cambridge University Press 2010).

Week 8 永續發展與法律;法律之不同形式:原則與規則
Bugge HC and Voigt C (eds), Sustainable development in international and national law: what did the Brundtland report do to legal thinking and legal development, and where can we go from here? (Europa law publishing 2008).
A. Dan Tarlock, ‘Ideas without Institutions: The Paradox of Sustainable Development’ (2001) 9 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 35.

Week 9 永續發展作為原則
Michael Decleris, The law of sustainable development: General principles (European Communities 2000).

Week 10 永續發展作為規則
Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger and Ashfaq Khalfan, Sustainable development law: principles, practices, and prospects (Oxford 2004).

Week 11 「永續發展目標」(SDGs)與「臺灣永續發展目標」;SDGs與CSR、ESG,什麼關係?
Janou?kova, Svatava, Toma? Hak, and Bed?ich Moldan ‘Global SDGs assessments: Helping or confusing indicators?’ (2018) 10 Sustainability5, 1540.

Week 12 永續發展指標與永續報告(Corporate Sustainability Reports)
Hak, Tomas, Bedrich Moldan, and Arthur Lyon Dahl (eds), Sustainability indicators: a scientific assessment Vol. 67 (Island Press 2012).

Week 13 永續影響評估:永續,誰說了算?
Davies GR, 'Appraising Weak and Strong Sustainability: Searching for a Middle Ground' (2013) 10 Consilience: The Journal of Sustainable Development 111.
Jenny Pope and others, ‘Reconceptualising sustainability assessment’ (2017) 62 Environmental impact assessment review 205-215, 208.
Serenella Sala, Biagio Ciuffo, and Peter Nijkamp, ‘A systemic framework for sustainability assessment’ (2015) 119 Ecological Economics 314-325.

Week 14 期末報告與討論:尋找問題
Week 15 期末報告與討論:研究設計
Week 16 學生團體報告/辯論:Internal colloquium 
參考書目
 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
   
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題